Pakistan's Emergency and the Commonwealth Response
Gudrun Dewey
Project Officer, Police Programme International, CHRI
On Saturday 3
November, as the Commonwealth Heads of Government prepared to
come together in Kampala, General Pervez Musharraf declared a
state of emergency in Pakistan. He suspended the Constitution,
dismissed Pakistan’s independent judiciary and removed all private
television transmissions from the air while police commenced widespread
arrests of politicians, lawyers, human rights defenders and protestors.
Targeted at maintaining power as President and Chief of Army Staff,
with the justification of maintaining stability in Pakistan, the
measures have stifled democracy and the fundamental rights of
people across Pakistan.
The state of emergency
is in stark contrast with the Harare Principles, the political
values to which every member of the Commonwealth, including Pakistan,
is committed. Primarily, the Principles bind Commonwealth members
to the protection of fundamental human rights and the promotion
of democracy, democratic processes, the rule of law, independence
of the judiciary and just and honest government.
The Emergency
in Focus
In his declaration,
General Musharraf cited that two threats to Pakistan – the spread
of violent extremism and judicial interference in the executive
– required emergency rule if he was to prevent the country from
“suicide”.1 He brought the Provisional Constitutional Order into
force to govern the emergency, suspending Pakistan’s Constitution
along with the fundamental human rights protections it contains.2
The declaration
of emergency ousted Pakistan’s independent judiciary by requiring
all judges in the country to be immediately governed by a new
oath of office, under which they must pledge not to challenge
the emergency or General Musharraf.3 Immediately following
the declaration, Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and other justices
of the Supreme Court convened urgently to try and strike down
the emergency order. Instead they were forcibly arrested and placed
under high security house arrest.
The declaration
accuses the judiciary of interfering in the function of the executive,
arguing that during the past year it has undermined the Government,
demoralised the police and threatened the security of the state
by releasing terrorists. In reality, a more accurate assessment
is that the judiciary, as it is bound to, has been upholding the
rule of law and fulfilling its function to check excesses of police
conduct and General Musharraf’s expansive presidential power.
more...
1.
Proclamation of Emergency (Issued 3 November 2007): available
at http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/post_03nov07/proclamation_emergency_20071103.html.
2 Provisional Constitution Order No 1 of 2007: available at http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/post_03nov07/pco_1_2007.html