Search
Working for the practical realisation of human rights in the Commonwealth
RTI Home

APPLYING THE LAW

What Type Of Information Do You Need To Release?

The Central Act in India begins by explicitly recognising that all citizens have the "right to information". This is in accordance with the various Supreme Court decisions that have recognised that the right to access information is a fundamental right under the Constitution. In practice, it means that every citizen has a right to access information from government, and all public bodies have a corresponding duty to provide information (except in a small number of cases where disclosure could be harmful to national interests).

Elaborating on the broad concept of a right to information, public bodies covered by the Central Act must release information in two ways:

  1. Bodies must proactively publish important and/or routine information, referred to as suo moto or proactive disclosure. The proactive disclosure requirements under section 4 of the Central Act have been discussed earlier;
  2. Bodies must disclose information on request, except where an exemption provision applies.

When considering information requests, you need to keep in mind that the key objective of the law is to promote greater access to information by the public and therefore, to release as much information as possible. The public has a "right to know" under the Constitution, as has been recognised by the Supreme Court of India on numerous occasions.

Access to "Information"

Section 3 of the Central Act gives all citizens a "right to information". Notably:

  • Section s.2(f) defines "information" to include "any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be access by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force".
  • Section 2(i) defines "record" to include: "(a) any document, manuscript and file; (b) any microfilm, microfiche and facsimile copy of a document; (c) any reproduction of image or images embodied in such microfilm (whether enlarged or not); and (d) any other material produced by a computer or any other device".

Even more significantly, section 2(j) defines the "right to information" very broadly and recognises that a citizen can request a range of different types of information in a range of different formats including:

  • Obtaining certified copies of documents or records;
  • Inspecting records;
  • Taking notes and extracts;
  • Inspecting public works;
  • Taking samples of material from public works.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Question: Are file notings covered by the Act?
File notings are not a generic category which can be exempted under the Central Act. The unequivocal legal position is that file notings fall clearly into the non-exhaustive definition of "information" in s.2 and have not been protected from disclosure under the exemptions under s.8. Under s.2(f) of the Central Act the definition of 'information' is very wide and includes 'records'. Section 2(i)(a) of the Central Act defines a 'record' to include any document, manuscript and file. The Manual of Office Procedure, which all civil servants adhere to by law when carrying out their duties, defines 'file' to cover 'notes' and 'appendices to notes'. Furthermore, under the 1997 Public Records Rules, 'file' means a collection of papers relating to the public records on a specific subject matter consisting of correspondence, notes and appendices thereto and assigned with a file number. Thus, from a legal and technical perspective, the term 'file' as understood in section 2(i)(a) of the RTI Act includes file notings and so file notings can legally be disclosed according to the Central Act.

Question: What does s.2(f) mean when it talks about information that can be accessed from private bodies?
The final clause in section 2(f) states that information includes "information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force". The intention of this clause is to permit a member of the public to apply to a public authority to access information which the authority should have collected from a private body. For example, if under environmental legislation, a government department is supposed to collect an annual report on waste disposal, a member of the public can request the department for the annual report and if it has not yet been submitted or received, the department is under a duty to access it from the private body under the relevant piece of legislation and then provide it to the requester (unless it is covered by an exemption in s.8).

Question: Can a person really inspect works and take samples under the Central Act?
Although a relatively unusual provision in an access law it is true that section 2 (j) of the Central Act permits the inspection of works and taking of samples. In fact, a number of State RTI laws included such a provision. In Delhi, for example, the provision allowing the inspection of works and taking samples was used to great effect to enable people to access information about whether government and the contractors it employed were properly undertaking public works.

Please click on the link to the Central RTI Act to read the detailed provisions contained in the law. Please click on the link to CHRI's State RTI pages to find out more about relevant rules and implementation in your specific State.