|
Submission
of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) to the Commonwealth
Ministerial Action Group's meeting, September 2005
The
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), as the main Commonwealth
human rights NGO, is committed to providing a civil society perspective
on the issues and countries considered by the Commonwealth Ministerial
Action Group (CMAG). This submission covers the situation in Pakistan,
the only country currently on CMAG's agenda; the Maldives, a country
of great concern to CHRI; and a thematic area of concern - the state
of policing in the Commonwealth.
Pakistan
Despite
the fact that sixteen months have passed since Pakistan's reinstatement
to full membership of the Commonwealth, there has been little positive
change in terms of human rights, democracy and good governance.
On the contrary, the situation has deteriorated. This situation
seems to be undermining the standards that the Commonwealth has
stated are required for membership of the association.
In
previous submissions, CHRI has documented human rights violations
in Pakistan particularly regarding violent intimidation of the media
and members of civil society, as well as violence by para-military
forces. We reiterate that such violations continue. One recent case
involved the attack in Lahore on Asma Jahangir, the United Nations
special rapporteur on freedom of religion and head of the Human
Rights Commission of Pakistan. Ms. Jahangir was beaten with batons
by the police and publicly humiliated. Jahangir and another 41 people,
including Hina Jilani - the UN special rapporteur on human rights
defenders - were arrested during the event.
Recently,
police in Karachi cracked down on a number of publications, raiding
the offices of several newspapers, arresting four journalists and
several newspaper vendors as well as confiscating copies of the
publications. There is much concern that the government of Pakistan
may be using fears over religious and sectarian extremism to pressure
newspapers and curb freedom of the press.
Arbitrary
arrests and disappearances in the name of the 'war on terror' are
frequent. The Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) was amended to provide for
life-imprisonment for supporters of terrorists - however the ATA
seems to be abused by the Government, resulting in many disappearances,
arrests without trial and cases of torture. There are even reports
of a six-year-old girl being held in prison under the Terrorism
Act.
Of
major concern is the lack of democratic governance in Pakistan.
A restoration of democracy involving a full shift from military
to civilian governance has not yet occurred; on the contrary, the
role of military in governance has actually been strengthened and
institutionalised. There has also been the case of at least one
para-military group which has been made into a serious political
force by President Musharraf and which is backed by the military
- thus further strengthening the military control of the government.
The
recent local council elections were described by the opposition
as the "most violent and most blatantly rigged" in Pakistan's electoral
history. More than 40 people died in the two phases of the polls,
amid widespread allegations of rigging and other malpractices both
at pre-poll stage as well as on the polling day itself. One positive
aspect was that the Chief Election Commissioner cancelled the polls
results in areas where women were not allowed to vote. The opposition
have expressed a complete lack of confidence in the ability of President
Musharraf's government to hold free, fair and impartial elections.
Some have also expressed their intention to boycott any further
elections under the government of Musharraf.
This
political situation is particularly of concern considering the Commonwealth's
commitment to democratic, civilian governance and that Pakistan's
reinstatement to the Commonwealth was on the basis of progress made
in restoring democracy and rebuilding democratic institutions.
CHRI
calls on CMAG to strongly indicate to the Pakistan authorities that
further delays in restoring democracy and continued disregard for
universal principles of human rights and the rule of law would lead
to re-suspension of Pakistan from the councils of the Commonwealth.
Maldives
CHRI
wishes to draw CMAG's attention again to the Maldives, due to continued
violations of human rights and disregard for the principles of participatory
democratic governance and the rule of law.
We
are pleased to note President Gayoom's public commitments to reform,
and the Commonwealth's provision of technical assistance. The Commonwealth
needs to publicly state its intention to closely monitor these reforms
as international scrutiny, as well as support, is essential in better
ensuring that reforms become reality within the stipulated timeframe.
However,
despite President Gayoom's promises of goodwill, violations of the
Harare Principles continue. Though the Maldivian government has
taken a positive step forward in allowing the registration of political
parties, this has been undermined by recent events such as the arrests,
particularly targeting members of the main opposition party, which
took place during peaceful demonstrations. We are concerned by reports
of human rights violations, including the use of violence, against
those arrested. We urge that those arrested and charged are given
a fair trial - particularly considering the implications which these
trials will have on the political future of the country. We are
encouraged by the permission granted to the International Commission
of Jurists (ICJ) to observe the trials and hope that trials are
serious, fair and impartial. Anything less than the highest standards
of impartiality and fairness by the judiciary towards members of
the opposition would eliminate any credibility of the government
regarding their claims for striving to achieve democracy.
Other
concerns relate to harassment of the free press, particularly when
the government's actions are criticised; and restrictions on civil
society through delays in registering human rights NGOs. We must
also express our apprehension for the Human Rights Commission Act
ratified on August 18th. While it is positive that efforts have
been made to make the Maldives Human Rights Commission a statutory
body, concerns have been raised that the Act does not conform to
the Paris Principles (the foundation and reference point for the
establishment and operation of national human rights institutions)
and may in effect diminish the authority and credibility of the
Commission.
We
strongly recommend the inclusion of the Maldives in the Concluding
Statement of the 26th Meeting of CMAG. Despite the good work being
done behind the scenes by the Commonwealth Secretariat in providing
assistance to the Maldives, we find it disappointing that the Commonwealth
has not yet issued a public statement condemning negative events
going on in the country. A clear and strong statement by CMAG would
send a message to the Maldivian administration and other Commonwealth
nations that actions that violate the Harare Principles are unacceptable
and will not be overlooked by the Commonwealth. Continued silence
implies acceptance and risks damaging the Commonwealth's reputation
for membership being dependent on the principles of democracy and
human rights articulated in the Harare Declaration.
Zimbabwe
While
Zimbabwe has left the Commonwealth, CHRI wishes to draw CMAG's attention
to the deteriorating human rights and political situation. The decision
to withdraw from the Commonwealth was taken by an undemocratically-elected
government and Zimbabwe may return to the Commonwealth once a democracy
is reinstated.
CHRI
condemns 'operation clean up' - a housing demolition operation by
the Zimbabwean government aimed predominantly at opposition-oriented
communities - which has made over 700,000 people homeless or jobless.
A further 2.4 million people are calculated to have been affected.
UN officials have confirmed that demolitions continue in Eastern
Zimbabwe despite claims by the government that these have ended.
Among the people evicted are a large number of women with HIV/AIDS,
widows, children with disabilities and HIV/AIDS orphans. Starvation
deaths have also increased.
The
Constitutional Amendment (No.17) Bill was passed in the Zimbabwean
Parliament on 30th August 2005. The Bill includes derogations to
the right to freedom of movement as well as amendments to the protection
of property giving the government more power at the expense of the
citizen. This Bill is a further indication of the Zimbabwean government's
lack of respect for the principle of constitutionalism and the rule
of law as well as its disregard for the protection of fundamental
human rights and the need by the state to adhere to minimum human
rights norms.
CHRI
calls on the Commonwealth to speak out in favour of democracy and
human rights in Zimbabwe and to engage with civil society groups
in Zimbabwe and the Zimbabwean diaspora.
Policing
in the Commonwealth
Membership
of the Commonwealth requires states to uphold democracy and respect
human rights principles, in line with the core Commonwealth values
as stated in the Commonwealth Harare Declaration. All 53 member
countries are expected to reflect and promote these ideals that
are fundamental to the very existence of the association. Clearly,
fulfilling these high hopes requires the state and all its institutions
- including the police - to uphold and entrench these guiding principles
and values. As protectors of the rule of law, the police have a
prime responsibility to create an environment in which people can
exercise their rights and freedoms.
Yet,
repeated citations of police wrong-doing ranging from individual
bad behavior to institutionalised criminality are undermining the
fundamental principles of the Harare Declaration. Illegal, corrupt
and coercive policing methods damage democracy, weaken the rule
of law and lead to gross violations of human rights. Rising crime
rates, greater perceptions of vulnerability and fear of victimisation
in all parts of the Commonwealth demand improved policing. Unprecedented
security concerns have created more room for heavy-handed policing
methods and tighter internal security regimes. This has generated
new problems in police-community relations and torn at the interface
of policing, democratic values and human rights.
Routine
disobedience to procedural law, eroding constitutional guarantees
and thereby attacking key civil and political rights, is a prevalent
feature of abuse of power by the police. This includes detaining
people without reasonable cause or for longer than permissible periods,
without bringing them before a delegated authority, carrying out
indiscriminate arrests - or even taking innocent family members
hostage to coerce those wanted for questioning to turn themselves
in. Police forces in Jamaica, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea have
frequently been indicted for excessive use of force and the high
rate of fatality in police actions. Corruption too, is impedeing
police functioning in large parts of the Commonwealth. A bribe is
often a prerequisite to registering a crime - or for looking away,
with payments made to help "steer" investigations. Most alarmingly,
regular reports from all the regions of the Commonwealth show that
torture is a fairly commonplace incident of custody, used by the
police as a tool to extract confessions or simply harrass individuals.
Equally
disturbing is the stifling by the police of legitimate political
activity. This has helped ruling elites marginalise political opponents
in the Maldives and topple governments in the Solomon Islands. At
other times, the police have been used to silence independent voices
of journalists, public protesters, or human rights defenders. The
existence of bias or prejudice towards ethnic, religious or liguistic
minorities is another major cause of concern. Crimes against women
abound in Commonwealth countries but are too often met with a poor
response, with stereotyping of women and patriarchal attitudes prejudicing
the way police handle cases.
Worryingly,
new anti-terror laws in many Commonwealth countries give the police
more procedural leeway, more powers to act on suspicion and greater
subjective discretion. Sweeping powers to hold people without charge
or trial, often on the basis of secret evidence, and prolonged incommunicado
detention facilitates coercive and heavyhanded policing, often relying
on torture. The human rights implications of these policies were
recently demonstrated in London when an innocent man was killed
due to unthinking application of newly adopted operating procedures.
Carte blanche policies designed to deal with heightened security
scenarios- such as "shoot on sight" orders for instance - can have
tragic and unjust consequences.
The
evolution of policing in many Commonwealth countries has undoubtedly
been negatively influenced by long periods of colonialism, dictatorship,
apartheid, coups, internal conflicts, militarisation, politicisation
and more recently, the preoccupation with terrorism. But it cannot
be emphasised enough that poor policing casts a long shadow over
democracy, development and the realisation of human rights. Not
only does it allow crime to boom, but also diminishes national stability
and prospects for development, and negatively impacts the government's
legitimacy.
Despite
strong evidence that poor policing contributes to the notable sense
of lawlessness and insecurity felt by citizens around the Commonwealth,
resistance to change has been stubborn and persistent. Too many
countries of the Commonwealth are yet to reform their police into
an institution of governance that functions according to the Harare
Principles. While good practice exists in the Commonwealth, unfortunately
there appears to be a lack of political will in too many countries
to ensure that this is implemented. In the Commonwealth context
- where membership is premised on adherance to the Harare Principles
- this is inexcusable. Now is the time for action.
CHRI
is committed to promoting a model of democratic policing in which
the police are:
- subject to the rule of law and responsible to
protecting human rights;
- accountable to a variety of institutions;
- transparent about policies, decisions and actions
taken in most spheres of their work;
- responsive to the people they serve; and " representative
of the people they serve.
This
is the model of policing that democracy demands and governments
are duty bound to provide. Reforming policing across the Commonwealth
requires changing and refining laws, putting in place innovative
institutional arrangements, and altering the culture within police
organisations. With the requisite political will and concerted efforts
and cooperation between governments, police officials and civil
society, such reforms are entirely achievable.
Recommendation
to CMAG: Citations of police misconduct - violations of
human rights, excessive use of force, widespread violence, abuse
of power, disobedience to law, bias, criminality, and corruption
- require a strong response from governments. CHRI calls on CMAG
- as the body responsible for monitoring serious or ongoing violations
of the Harare Declaration - to focus sharply on the police as an
important state insitution and hold governments accountable for
violations of this Declaration committed by their police organisations.
Additional
recommendations: We would also like to draw CMAG's attention
to recommendations made to other Commonwealth target groups. These
include:
The
Commonwealth Heads of Government must:
In
their CHOGM communiqué:
- recognise that the Commonwealth principles of
accountability, transparency, participation, adherence to rule
of law, respect for diversity and democratic functioning apply
to the security and justice sectors, including police organisations;
- explicitly acknowledge that democratic policing
is crucial to realising democracy and development;
- commit the Commonwealth to developing Commonwealth
Principles on Policing drawn from its core principles and international
standards; and
- undertake to assist member states to apply these
principles to policing everywhere in the Commonwealth.
Mandate
the Commonwealth Secretariat to further better policing through:
- providing member countries with technical assistance
in reforming laws, crafting institutional arrangements and adopting
practices that will eliminate abuse, corruption and ensure better
accountability;
- providing the Human Rights Unit with adequate
resources to engage with police organisations, focusing on adherence
to human rights standards;
- undertaking a series of Commonwealth wide exchanges
for police ministers, personnel, experts and civil society designed
to encourage the spread of good practice in democratic policing;
- catalysing the formation of a Commonwealth Association
of Police Officers that can mutually assist and share ideas.
Additionally,
Commonwealth Heads of Government must:
- solemnly agree to ratify international human
rights treaties within a finite time frame and develop a mechanism
at CHOGMs to report on and monitor implementation of past commitments;
- affirm compliance with the standards of policing
required by the International Bill of Rights, the UN Code of Conduct
for Law Enforcement Officials, and the UN Basic Principles on
the Use of Force and Firearms.
Member
countries must:
- acknowledge that it is the foremost duty of a
state to ensure people's right to safety and security and thereby
to provide a police organisation that is efficient and effective
and adheres to the rule of law;
- review and recast police laws, rules and regulations,
especially those that pre-date the 1948 Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, so as to incorporate and further the principles
of democratic policing;
- re-examine internal security laws to minimise
the possibility of impunity and remove obstacles to prosecution,
victim compensation and civil suits for police wrongdoing;
- protect whistleblowers from harm and victimisation
through legislation and supportive systems;
- strengthen traditional executive, legislative,
and judicial oversight of police and put in place and support
multiple additional independent civilian oversight mechanisms,
such as an ombudsman, human rights commission, anti-corruption
body, dedicated police complaints agency or civilian review board
as appropriate;
- exercise oversight over executive responsibility
and police functioning by putting in place institutional arrangements
such as strong, autonomous police service boards;
- publish annual performance targets and evaluation
measurements against which adherence to human rights, value for
money, performance and community satisfaction can be publicly
judged;
- design transparent and merit based procedures
that can be measured against objective publicly-known criteria
for representative and non-discriminatory recruitment, selection,
and appointment of leadership and rank and file;
- ensure good service conditions for police and
fair accountability procedures applicable to all;
- initiate procedures and mechanisms designed to
involve civil society groups and the community at large in creating
policy, determining priorities, setting targets and evaluating
performance;
- re-examine training content, methodology and
frequency to emphasise human rights awareness.

|
|